Intranasal corticosteroids a leading treatment for allergic rhinitis
Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are the leading treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) due to their comprehensive effectiveness in managing a wide array of symptoms.
INCS are administered either intermittently for seasonal AR or continuously for perennial AR. If symptoms persist despite initial treatment, combining INCS with antihistamines may be beneficial to enhance symptom relief.
INCS work by decreasing the release of inflammatory mediators and cytokines, which provides effective symptomatic relief. They are most beneficial when used continuously or in prolonged treatment blocks, with a noticeable effect occurring within 7 to 12 hours and peak benefit observed after about 2 weeks of regular use.
INCS are generally well-tolerated, but they can cause local side effects such as nasal dryness, burning sensations, blood-tinged secretions, and epistaxis. To alleviate these issues, using saline to moisturise the nasal passages and ensuring proper spray technique - by aiming away from the nasal septum - can help reduce discomfort.
The South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group (SAARWG), in its recent guidelines, has advocated for INCS as a first-line choice in the treatment of AR. This recommendation is based on INCS's superior effectiveness and faster action. These are believed to be due to INCS’s glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity and anti-inflammatory potency.
It should be noted that some INCS are more generally potent than others. For example, fluticasone propionate, fluticasone furoate, ciclesonide, and mometasone furoate are known for their high receptor selectivity and retention in nasal tissue, resulting in minimal systemic absorption (less than 1%). This contrasts with other INCS like budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, and triamcinolone, which have higher systemic bioavailability and potential for broader effects beyond the nasal passages.
A TALE OF TWO FLUTICASONES
Fluticasone furoate (FF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) are two widely used INCS, delivered via a metered spray device designed for improved comfort and consistent dosing. Preclinical studies indicated that FF had a higher glucocorticoid receptor affinity compared to FP and other corticosteroids and demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory effects.
These effects include accelerated gene transcription and inhibition of key inflammatory pathways. Since then, numerous clinical trials have confirmed FF’s effectiveness in treating AR. In a comparative study by Nambiar et al, FF administered once daily was found to be as effective as FP administered twice daily in alleviating AR symptoms. Both medications were found to be well tolerated. Because it is a once-daily formulation, FF has notable advantages over FP formulations since one may expect better treatment adherence and a reduced cost to the patient.
CONCLUSION
INCS are a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic rhinitis due to their targeted efficacy and lower systemic side effect profile. Newer formulations like fluticasone furoate offer enhanced receptor affinity and efficacy.
Images: Shutterstock.com
REFERENCES
Nambiar, V, et al, 2016. Fluticasone furoate verses fluticasone propionate: a comparative study by assessment of nasal mucociliary clearance time on patients with allergic rhinitis. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;2:35-9.
Richards, G, et al, 2024. Allergic rhinitis: Review of the diagnosis and management: South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group. South African Family Practice. (Online) 2078-6204
Sousa-Pinto, B, et al, 2023. Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2023, 13:e076614.
Zhong, Y, et al, 2022. Quantitative comparison of dose–effect and time–course of fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology. 2022, 27:194–201.